<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wolf In Sheep&#8217;s Clothing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kimkinscam.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/23/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kimkinscam.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/23/</link>
	<description>The Kimkins diet is hazardous to your health</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 10:56:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Watcher</title>
		<link>http://kimkinscam.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/23/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Watcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 04:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kimkinscam.wordpress.com/?p=23#comment-87</guid>
		<description>So Dana really thinks there is no difference between her &quot;sneaking &quot; onto LCF (free) and ducks examining Kimkins (paid for with hard-earned money.) Somehow she thinks of herself as an anti-duck doing the same thing as the ducks, only in reverse. If she doesn&#039;t see the difference, she is either a hardcore KK&#039;er admin-type, or she is a smarty pants goose. Not duck! Neither her methods nor her purposes are admirable like the ducks&#039; are. It&#039;s amazing how fast the very real differences outed her. Roll on, Dana. You&#039;re hissing into the wind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Dana really thinks there is no difference between her &#8220;sneaking &#8221; onto LCF (free) and ducks examining Kimkins (paid for with hard-earned money.) Somehow she thinks of herself as an anti-duck doing the same thing as the ducks, only in reverse. If she doesn&#8217;t see the difference, she is either a hardcore KK&#8217;er admin-type, or she is a smarty pants goose. Not duck! Neither her methods nor her purposes are admirable like the ducks&#8217; are. It&#8217;s amazing how fast the very real differences outed her. Roll on, Dana. You&#8217;re hissing into the wind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: honeybeesblog</title>
		<link>http://kimkinscam.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/23/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>honeybeesblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 07:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kimkinscam.wordpress.com/?p=23#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Hi MJR,
I thought the DANA posts were interesting as well.
DANA did say, to 2BIG, if guessed who she was that she would admit to it. 
I do think she is on LCF, but not as a person we consider a duck. Just my viewpoint but if she really was a duck, she would have not wanted that known because she would have wanted to stay doing what she has been doing..IF- being the key word here. IF- it had been true she would be jeopardizing her position and that doesn&#039;t make sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi MJR,<br />
I thought the DANA posts were interesting as well.<br />
DANA did say, to 2BIG, if guessed who she was that she would admit to it.<br />
I do think she is on LCF, but not as a person we consider a duck. Just my viewpoint but if she really was a duck, she would have not wanted that known because she would have wanted to stay doing what she has been doing..IF- being the key word here. IF- it had been true she would be jeopardizing her position and that doesn&#8217;t make sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kimkinscam</title>
		<link>http://kimkinscam.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/23/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>kimkinscam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kimkinscam.wordpress.com/?p=23#comment-67</guid>
		<description>2Big4mysize
I gotcha!  I believe we are absolutely on the same page here.  I just wanted to make sure my point was clear on Dana NOT being a Big threat to the ducks.  I think we both agree on that one.  And I wanted to also make it clear that kimmer shouldn&#039;t (although I&#039;d love it) relax. The REAL ducks are putting the heat on... and I love seeing those 404 error pages too.  Just wish it would come up when I access KK. 
Keep up the good work, 2Big, I love reading your blog and appreciate how you handled Dana. At least you tried to logically converse with her.  I probably would have just hurled insults. LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2Big4mysize<br />
I gotcha!  I believe we are absolutely on the same page here.  I just wanted to make sure my point was clear on Dana NOT being a Big threat to the ducks.  I think we both agree on that one.  And I wanted to also make it clear that kimmer shouldn&#8217;t (although I&#8217;d love it) relax. The REAL ducks are putting the heat on&#8230; and I love seeing those 404 error pages too.  Just wish it would come up when I access KK.<br />
Keep up the good work, 2Big, I love reading your blog and appreciate how you handled Dana. At least you tried to logically converse with her.  I probably would have just hurled insults. LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2big4mysize</title>
		<link>http://kimkinscam.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/23/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>2big4mysize</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kimkinscam.wordpress.com/?p=23#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Kimkinscam I think you misread my comment.

the Kimmer relaxing and the ducks not trusting was the senerio if I had said yes to Dana and then sockpuppets has started to falsely accuse ducks.
I know ducks are working hard. To see some of it all you have to do is be late to the party on the share the love challenge and see all the 404 error pages or the correction statements from the article sites owners about not supporting kimkins and the article has been removed.

That was why I debated even allowing Dana&#039;s commnet, but since I felt it showed her true person I did. From her other statments she has outed herself for all to see and since she keeps commneting and saying she has talked to kimmer and is bringing me stuff from LCF old Kimmer topics one has to wonder just how much current information from Kimmer she has access too. I mean if I&#039;m the supporter and buddy Dana claims to be talking with my &quot;good&quot; friend Kimmer I&#039;d sure get a more current quote about the &lt;a href=&quot;http://lowcarbdiets.about.com/od/populardietplans/a/kimkinsdiet.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Kimkins.com&lt;/a&gt; fats position then something from 2004 on LCFs since according to every one who has seen the inside of the site the protein rule changed from LCFs version. You&#039;d think if &lt;a href=&quot;http://kimkinsdiettruth.wordpress.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Kimmer&lt;/a&gt; had a place to set the record straight she would say Dana tell them they are wrong about that and here is the official posistion on fats in my diet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kimkinscam I think you misread my comment.</p>
<p>the Kimmer relaxing and the ducks not trusting was the senerio if I had said yes to Dana and then sockpuppets has started to falsely accuse ducks.<br />
I know ducks are working hard. To see some of it all you have to do is be late to the party on the share the love challenge and see all the 404 error pages or the correction statements from the article sites owners about not supporting kimkins and the article has been removed.</p>
<p>That was why I debated even allowing Dana&#8217;s commnet, but since I felt it showed her true person I did. From her other statments she has outed herself for all to see and since she keeps commneting and saying she has talked to kimmer and is bringing me stuff from LCF old Kimmer topics one has to wonder just how much current information from Kimmer she has access too. I mean if I&#8217;m the supporter and buddy Dana claims to be talking with my &#8220;good&#8221; friend Kimmer I&#8217;d sure get a more current quote about the <a href="http://lowcarbdiets.about.com/od/populardietplans/a/kimkinsdiet.htm" rel="nofollow">Kimkins.com</a> fats position then something from 2004 on LCFs since according to every one who has seen the inside of the site the protein rule changed from LCFs version. You&#8217;d think if <a href="http://kimkinsdiettruth.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">Kimmer</a> had a place to set the record straight she would say Dana tell them they are wrong about that and here is the official posistion on fats in my diet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kimkinscam</title>
		<link>http://kimkinscam.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/23/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>kimkinscam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kimkinscam.wordpress.com/?p=23#comment-65</guid>
		<description>2big4mysize-
Thanks for your comment!  I agree with you about Dana. She is a wannabe - that&#039;s why I stated that she is dangerous IN HER OWN MIND.  She isn&#039;t a REAL DUCK and has NO IDEA what goes on behind the scenes.  If she did, she wouldn&#039;t be leaving comments on your blog, arguing the credibility of the kk diet.  People like Dana can&#039;t keep their identity (beliefs) hidden for very long.  She showed her colors rather quickly (outing herself)- don&#039;t you think?  

But, I have to disagree with kimmer being able to RELAX.  And ducks not being able to trust other ducks.  NOT HAPPENING! If anything, the ducks have come together, as of late, and have accomplished a lot in the fight against Heidi Diaz.  I wish she WOULD relax - but, weather or not she should.... that&#039;s up for debate.  I&#039;ve seen an enormous amount of &#039;trust&#039; and cooperation amongst the ducks, behind the scenes.  Those that &quot;walk the walk&quot; have the same goal in mind - to STOP the madness and close KK down.  Heidi doesn&#039;t stand a chance!! Quack!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2big4mysize-<br />
Thanks for your comment!  I agree with you about Dana. She is a wannabe &#8211; that&#8217;s why I stated that she is dangerous IN HER OWN MIND.  She isn&#8217;t a REAL DUCK and has NO IDEA what goes on behind the scenes.  If she did, she wouldn&#8217;t be leaving comments on your blog, arguing the credibility of the kk diet.  People like Dana can&#8217;t keep their identity (beliefs) hidden for very long.  She showed her colors rather quickly (outing herself)- don&#8217;t you think?  </p>
<p>But, I have to disagree with kimmer being able to RELAX.  And ducks not being able to trust other ducks.  NOT HAPPENING! If anything, the ducks have come together, as of late, and have accomplished a lot in the fight against Heidi Diaz.  I wish she WOULD relax &#8211; but, weather or not she should&#8230;. that&#8217;s up for debate.  I&#8217;ve seen an enormous amount of &#8216;trust&#8217; and cooperation amongst the ducks, behind the scenes.  Those that &#8220;walk the walk&#8221; have the same goal in mind &#8211; to STOP the madness and close KK down.  Heidi doesn&#8217;t stand a chance!! Quack!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2big4mysize</title>
		<link>http://kimkinscam.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/23/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>2big4mysize</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 04:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kimkinscam.wordpress.com/?p=23#comment-62</guid>
		<description>MJR I felt as I posted Dana was just trying to stir up disention in the ranks. Look at the senerio, guess and i&#039;ll tell you if you are right.  I bite and say okay. Soak puppets run to my blog to accuse ducks of being wolfs as we have seen with the sockpuppets using ducks screen names to comment in favor of kimkins on the ABC blog and other new sites. Soon kimmer can relax cause no duck trusts no other duck and no duck will assist another duck cause they don&#039;t feel they are sincere in their efforts. No, Dana is a wannabe

If Dana is to be believed Dana has already outed herself</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MJR I felt as I posted Dana was just trying to stir up disention in the ranks. Look at the senerio, guess and i&#8217;ll tell you if you are right.  I bite and say okay. Soak puppets run to my blog to accuse ducks of being wolfs as we have seen with the sockpuppets using ducks screen names to comment in favor of kimkins on the ABC blog and other new sites. Soon kimmer can relax cause no duck trusts no other duck and no duck will assist another duck cause they don&#8217;t feel they are sincere in their efforts. No, Dana is a wannabe</p>
<p>If Dana is to be believed Dana has already outed herself</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
